The Intermittent

Why Are You Still Here?

Tuesday, January 13, 2004

HELP THE AGED

Anyone out there care to englighten me on how to set up comments? I'm sure its very simple to those of you out there who, unlike me, have been doing this for a while. Please bear in mind when offering assistence that I'm dumb. It may be necassary to type slowly, and in all caps.

Any help is appreciated, and should be emailed to the Dave Intermittent email address over yonder. Thanks.
|
IF YOU WANT TO DESTROY THIS SWEATER

So, evidently, it's bad for Gen. Clark to wear sweaters in an effort to try and project an image that appeals to voters. Why is trying to appeal to voters a bad thing? Because Glenn Reynolds says so, dammit; and really, there is no more need for analysis once this pronouncement is made from on high.

Presumably, Glen intends to suggest that this shows desperation on the part of Clark; or that the "natural" Clark is not what the candidates want. And one or the both of these might be in fact correct. But let's not kid ourselves: Clark is not the only politician to worry about PR, or to alter themselves or their message in response to PR concerns. Are we really to think that President Bush doesn't worry about the way people see him? Are we really sure that his appearance isn't stage managed? Really? The RNC employs all those pollsters and spindoctors just to keep them off the streets? It's the Republican version of midnight basketball?

Right. I guess Bush must always fly onto aircraft carriers in navy jets and wearing a full flight suit, then. And all of the President's photo ops are magical, spontaneous events; pictures are never staged for political effect. Karl Rove has never, shut your mouth, tried to position Bush or policy to better appeal to voters, no sir. And even if, you know, maybe they did rig policy to appeal to voters, which is worse: jury-rigging up illegal steel tariffs or wearing more wool? I mean, one is an offense against free trade; the other is a crime against fashion. Clark is clearly the more insecure.

It's one thing to be naive about the dirty business of politics. It's quite another to know the truth, and, in the service of a political assault pretend that business as usual is a sign of weakness. A fool does the first; a hack, the second. Put Instapundit, in this case at least, in the second category.
|
MICHIGAN PORN LAWS: THE RETURN.

Remember that Michigan law, the one that was going to make displaying comics in places where kids could see them potentially illegal? The one we were all worked up about? It's been challenged by a consortium of booksellers. More as things develop. I'd guess there'll be a request for a preliminary injunction staying enforcment of the law; and the hearing on that request should be a pretty good barometer on the merits.
|
RECYCLING: IT'S GOOD FOR YOU?

So, now that Sean and Jim have cleared the waters of sharks and other lurking horrors, I’m taking the plunge too: I don’t think that the Marvel Age books are either a bad idea or a desecration of comics history.

Taking up the first point, I don’t see the business downside of this for Marvel. Those stories are paid for, and aren’t making them money, leaving aside a trade program based on nostalgia; why not put those stories to use? And hey, maybe if these are successful, Marvel can better subsidize new genres....ah, to dream.....but, assuming that Marvel doesn’t flood the bookstore market with dreck, it can’t hurt. Besides, we’ve already established that multiple genres are a key to the manga boom; and it therefore can’t hurt to have some superhero’s in the casserole.

With respect to the second point: yeah, I suppose that it’s sacrilege or something to redo the StanSteveJack stories. But on the other hand, movies are remade. Songs are covered. Plays are restaged. Why are comics sacrosanct? I can’t think of a good reason. And it’s not as if this will poison kids to the glories of Jack Kirby; I mean, I got news for everyone. Kids, by and large, are going to think that Kirby art looks silly. I know I did. I remember looking at old DC Who’s Who’s and very clearly thinking that some art looked cool and some art did not. And Kirby art did not. I remember getting a Captain Victory issue in one of those Sears’ catalog twenty comics grab bags. I thought that it sucked; it looked ameaturish. At that point, I suppose I thought that Mike Zeck was the bomb, as the kids say, or maybe Paul Smith. Byrne or Simonson, or maybe Romita Jr’s X-men work. But Kirby? Nope. John Buscema? Nope. Sal Buscema? Heeeellll no. Herb Trimpe? He was the butt of jokes. And I was not the outlier in artistic taste. When you’re twelve, Kirby looks like your granddad’s artist. If you’re lucky, you keep reading comics and look at Kirby with new eyes and an appreciation for the craft when you’re older. Of course, that won’t happen unless you started to read comics young--and hey, what do you know, that’s where the Marvel Age books are targeted: to the young. Hmmm. Maybe this isn’t that bad for the Masters after all. Also: these stories aren’t new, true. But then again, if you’ve never read the originals (or the countless retreads) they’re new to you. If I’m a ten year old reading comics for the first time, I don’t know that Electro has fought Spiderman once a year for forty years; I just know he’s fighting him now, and that it’s cool as all hell. Repitition is only a problem if the audience stays with a book for ten years; it’s not a problem for the new reader.

And of course, this is in no way a vote of confidence that Marvel will in fact pull this off, and will avoid being boneheads about implementing the whole thing.
|
GOOD NEWS FROM TOKYO

Speaking of manga, good to see that Warren Ellis is planning on writing for Tokyopop, if for no other reason than it signals that Tokyopop isn’t abandoning the adult market in favor of young girls; the thought of a Warren Ellis comic for young girls is slightly horrifying.
|

Wednesday, January 07, 2004

FOR THE SLEEP DEPRIVED

Evidently, oral arguments in were held yesterday in the appeal from the Gaiman/McFarlane lawsuit. The MPEG of the argument is here; PDF's of the briefs are here. But remember, heavy machinery should not be operated after reading legal briefs of any sort, and this site cannot be held responsible for any caused by legally induced drowsiness.

Looking at the briefs, Gaiman looks to be in better shape. Gaiman is in even better shape with Judge Posner on the panel. Perhaps more than any other Federal Judge, Judge Posner understands the perspective of an author; Posner is the Brian Michael Bendis of the Federal bench, cranking out book after book after article after opinion, most of impeccable quality, though not without controversy. This perspective is apparent in the oral argument; Judge Posner just lacerates McFarlane's lawyer on the sufficiency of the copyright notice included in various issues of Spawn. And then he tears into McFarlane's counsel for trying to claim that Gaiman had no rights to Cogliostro; after all, Posner notes, if Gaiman had no rights, what was McFarlane promising to get in return for giving up the rights to Miracleman? Given what we know about Todd, it doesn't seem likely that he'd give something for nothing, baseballs excepted.

Now, granted, the tenor of oral argument is not a perfect polestar to the eventual direction of the opinion. Sometimes Judges kick around lawyers whose position they agree with to make sure the parts really fit; or sometimes, just for the fun of it. Federal judges have life tenure, and get to be inscrutable if they want to be. Notwithstanding that caveat, I suspect that Gaiman comes out ok in this appeal. McFarlane's statute of limitations defense is very much crippled by the factual findings of the lower court; appellate courts do not very often disturb findings of fact--that's a big no no for appellate courts, which are not in a good position to evaluate facts or witnesses. McFarlane's second point on appeal, that Gaiman could have no rights in Cogliostro and Medieval Spawn as these characters can't be protected flies in the face of common sense. As Judge Posner points out, if these characters can't be protected, McFarlane Toys is in big trouble; and since McFarlane clearly thinks that--at least as used by him and his company--these characters can be protected, Gaiman could share in the copyright as joint author. Which means Todd owes Neil money or Miracleman, take your pick.

Final observation: it's never good practice to admit to an appellate panel that it's been over a year since you read the case you're putting forward as the touchstone to your legal analysis. Bad idea.

Final observation, part the second: Judge Posner is a personal hero to at least one of us here at the Intermittent. We would very much recommend his book Overcoming Law; a great work about the sources of legal doctrine, impeccably written, and with far more wit than is normally allotted to this type of scholarly work. More Posner here.
|
DEPARTMENT OF EGO INFLATION

Sean Collins, while smacking Rich Johnston about the head and face, notes that the comics blogosphere broke the Joss Whedon news before the "legitimate" news sites (to the extent such things actually exist). We also broke the story about the Hibbs/Marvel settlement before it the news sites did.

Therefore, if you've been reading this site since October, you've only wasted 97.4 percent of your time.
|
PTI JLA

Watching Pardon the Interruption today, and Tony Kornheiser notes that the planet Mars has given us, first among other things, J'onn J'onnz, the Martian Manhunter.

I have it on reliable authority that he also endorsed Desaad for the Oakland coaching job, what with the need for better team discipline and all.

This latter is a joke, by the way.
|

Tuesday, January 06, 2004

A STORY OF SOME RINGS

So. I've since been there, and back again. And there were rings involved, though more symbolic of comiitment than tools to establish power relations; also, the ceremony was unclear as to whether we get to pass into the West or not now--note to self: check on availability of boats. Long story short, there is now an official Mrs. Intermittent, and I am truly fortunate to have found someone to put up with all my tomfoolery and general dunderheadedness. Also fortunate to have so many friends and wellwishers at the event--including Mssrs. James and Dave Jon--and across the web. I am, to quote Richard Ashcroft, a lucky man.

I'm going to be easing back into this thing in the next couple of days. I didn't stay much abreast of news, comics or otherwise, while in Belize (a destination I highly recommend, by the way), and prior to the honeymoon I was preoccupied with trying to hold the wedding plans together; just when you think you've got it all figured out, someones jacket comes in midget size and the connection to the PA system doesn't work. Yeah, that's right--we DJ'ed our own wedding, thus avoiding my having to through a hired DJ off the roof for being obnoxious; and there is something to be said for having the ability to play the Gear Daddies cover of Little Red Corvette when you want a slow song.

Anyway. Thanks again for all the support, both for my wife and I and also for the site--for the half-assed hobby of my mine (the site, not my wife) I've been blown away by the reception. Hat tips, all around; and a promise of more posts, of Intermittent quality.
|

Monday, December 29, 2003

BLAMING IT ON PRECIOUS

Some of the best things in life are, indeed, intermittent, but some of the beautiful things are still unwaveringly constant. I was there a few day ago when Mr. Intermittent and Mrs. Intermittent told friends, family, the State, God and whoever else would listen that they are in it for the long good haul. And let me tell you, the road ahead of those two is top notch: freshly paved and blessedly unending. When the stunning bride-to-be was escorted down the isle, I'm told the look on Dave's face was in the top 10 moments of a wedding already packed with soon-to-be classics (I desperately tried to subtly crane my neck to see around Dave Jon and the best man, but to no avail). Luckily I'm a kali-wielding tiger claw ninja man, because my tear-dabbing was as stealthy as it was girlish.

The previous night at the post-rehearsal dinner shindig the father of the groom, after getting us started with the toastmastering, was about to pass the mic old school to yours truly. Unfortunately, I only told him the forgettable/regrettable line of, "Aaw, I can't be first..." So I'm saying it now in a custom-made speech for the blog (with the benefit of not having to tone it down for Grandma): Dave and his lovely bride rock harder than AC/DC, are better friends than KG and JB and look better together than a really good collection of your favorite trade paperbacks. They are but mere mortals but their hearts and souls together transcend terra firma into the high country. For these two, ladies and gentlemen, in the words of so many great songs: everything's gonna be alright.

These last few days have been some of the best for me, and are made better knowing there are so many more down my muddy psychedelic moonshiner trail. Mine's a little narrow at the moment, without too much room for a hot little number to ride shotgun, but the wedding of those two did the lion's share of convincing me that it's time to start installing a rumble seat or something. I'm sure I speak for this blog's other shamefully oft-absent poster as well when I say: Congratulations and God Bless Casa del Intermittent!
|

Wednesday, December 17, 2003

HIGHBROW ATTENTION OF THE DAY

The Economist names Persepolis as one of its books of the year, the only comic on a fairly upscale list. I think its fair to say that Persepolis has officialy joined Maus as a book we're supposed to give people to show the scope of the medium.

And I still haven't read it.
|
MEET THE NEW BOSS

Saw the announcment on Newsarama that Tokyopop was going to start publishing original content. Given that Tokyopop seems intent on marketing to younger kids--and especially younger girls--I wonder what kind of material they want. Is something like GYO out? Will they take horror books? What about crime fiction?

You know, a smart publisher looking to diversify could probably do alright for themselves hoovering up more adult manga and pushing it to the bookstores. But smart comics publisher is the last surviving oxymoron, now that military intelligence got its reprieve over the weekend.

John Jakala and Shawn Fumo, as always, are all over this.
|
DON'T CALL IT A COMEBACK

Ninth Art discusses comics covers. Alright, folks--deep breaths, and take a second before you post. Let's all hope we've learned something, OK?

Kevin Melrose got to this joke before me.
|
SHREDDIN' COMICS, FILLING QUOTAS

Missed out on commenting on the whole Corner Comics mess while it was ongoing; and anyway, Dirk got to the law before I could. A sad situation indeed. But not a surprising one. The IRS is an enforcement agency. It measures success not by how many citizens it makes happy but by how many it pisses off via enforcement actions. Individual IRS agents make their careers by filling quotas; they don't make careers out of working with the public to help find solutions to tax issues. And given this, it is no surprise that the IRS took the stance it did. It did it because it could, because they knew Corner could not fight back. Why try to make quotas by taking on those who can fight back? That's work, man. Much easier to pick on the weak. This is the nature of the beast.
|
SOMEWHERE UNDER THE WEATHER

The Flu has been having its way here at Intermittent World Headquarters. It is no fun at all; the muscle aches are particularily unpleasant, almost as much so as a Greg Horn cover. So to everyone out there, please take Alan's advice and wash your hands.
|